data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dc24/8dc24447437a40bdf958c01d3dfdecc6cf249332" alt=""
Here is a 100% crop at ISO 100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99bf6/99bf6d8ad25ec1a1146392e1b39e82aa45f05617" alt=""
ISO 200:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0816c/0816c1ea364d7986c5a6bcdb49b3e6fde7a6162e" alt=""
Clearly there is far more noise in the bokeh. There is very little chance you will ever see that in a print and as I said, you can take care of it easily with just a tiny bit of luminance noise reduction, but it might be good to be aware of it.
Now for completeness:
ISO 400:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb97f/bb97f95ba71c7095093ce2c8b029929dfe0e482f" alt=""
ISO 800:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/268e2/268e2e6c7db822963278fcc16af66b3b050c55aa" alt=""
ISO 1600:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03450/0345097d74864ce1f6ba219860dd957adc173e79" alt=""
This is where I reached the maximum shutter speed on the D300 (1/8000 s), so I cannot show you any more. The D300 does very well even at ISO 6400 as I reported before. At the low ISOs, Capture really doesn't do much better than Lightroom in noise reduction for those who are curious to know. However at high ISOs (>800), Capture does far better.
Interestingly, if you look at the filesizes of the jpeg exports I made from the 100% crops at high quality, you can see the exact same trend. Jpeg size, due to the way the compression operates, correlates with noise as the agorithm cannot distinguish between noise and real information. Here is the list:
ISO Size (KB)
100 148
200 160
400 172
800 188
1600 212
Since the scene and lighting was exactly the same in each image, the only thing that is different is the amount of noise in the image. Amazing that the effect is that clear.
Next: Analysis of the filesize in terms of noise
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.